Bay Area Transit Analysis

Who talks about housing density and transit at Bay Area public meetings

How public speakers split between the two labels

Loading…

These meetings decide real projects. San José Spotlight reported that in June 2025 the San Jose City Council voted unanimously to deny 135 homes, after neighbors objected.

Blocking housing density and transit keeps the next generation out of the places with the jobs, and keeps housing costs high. It also locks in car dependence: longer journeys, higher household travel costs, more traffic deaths and more tailpipe pollution.

One comment against more housing, one for it

NIMBY (against more housing)
“Mayor and council members, reject the missing middle framework recommendation in the general plan for your review. San Jose residents do not want three-story apartment complexes by right in residential neighborhoods without parking. Smart growth means concentrating density along commercial corridors, transit hubs, not quiet residential streets. …”

A member of the public, San José City Council, 2026-08-18.

YIMBY (for more of it)
“… I'm somebody who is very interested in housing in Fremont, and from what I can tell, this changing with the zoning does improve the ability for us to actually create more housing …”

A member of the public, Fremont City Council, 2026-05-05.

Transcribed hours are concentrated in a few bodies

circle area = hours of that body's meetings transcribed colour: share of those hours on transit, through to share on housing density hover a circle, or tap it on a phone, for that body's name and counts

Topic time per meeting-hour

Loading…

YIMBY / NIMBY

Loading…

Stance: the role gap

Loading…

Renter share

Loading…

Every instrument, number and limitation is on Methods, with a flowchart of how the data was made. The meetings are public recordings on YouTube, Granicus and Swagit, and the code that read them is at github.com/hotsoupisgood/baytransitanalysis.